Compliance Frameworks: GDPR, NIS2, DORA and 231

Pubblicato: 2026-06-30
compliance frameworks GDPR NIS2 DORA compliance audit evidence

Compliance frameworks become manageable when they are translated into the same operating model: requirements, controls, owners, evidence, and review cadence.

GDPR, NIS2, DORA, Modello 231, ISO 9001, and internal control programmes differ in language and scope, but they all ask the same practical question during an audit: can the organization show that the expected control exists, is owned, and produced reliable evidence during the review period?

This hub connects the main AuditReady resources for teams building that evidence chain.

Framework landing pages

Core concepts

How to map a framework into audit-ready work

Start with the requirement, but do not stop there. A requirement only becomes operational when it has:

  1. A control objective that describes the outcome.
  2. A control activity that can be performed consistently.
  3. An owner responsible for execution and review.
  4. Evidence that proves the activity occurred.
  5. An exception path when the control fails.

That structure lets teams reuse evidence across frameworks without treating each regulation as a separate document chase. A vendor evidence request may support NIS2 supply-chain review, DORA third-party risk, and an internal audit requirement at the same time if the evidence is mapped clearly.

Where AuditReady fits

AuditReady is not a certification engine and does not replace legal advice. It helps regulated teams make framework work operational: assign owners, collect evidence, link controls, request supplier documents, and export audit packs with a clear audit trail.

If your team is preparing for multiple frameworks, start by mapping the shared controls first. Then use the framework-specific pages above to refine the evidence expectations for each audit.